RECENT JUDGMENTS:
High Court of Bombay:
RECENT STATUTES:
RECENT NOTIFICATION:
OTHER UPDATE:
Monday 1 June 2015
Law Ministry’s Consultative Committee Meeting
The Minister for Law and Justice Shri D. V. Sadananda Gowda has said
that the National Litigation Policy, 2015 aims to suggest mechanism to
reduce the Government litigation and to make Government as an Efficient
and Responsible litigant. He was responding to concerns of the Members
of the Consultative Committee of the Parliament attached to his Ministry
on the framing of National Litigation Policy, 2015 which was the Agenda
Item for the meeting held today.
The Minister said that the policy suggest mechanism to reduce filing of cases by or against the Government. It also aims to transform Government as an Institution which does not believe in entering into unnecessary and avoidable litigation in the courts by taking appropriate steps at pre-litigation stage itself.
During the meeting members of the Committee Shri Kalyan Bannerjee and Shri Ayannur Manjunath , said there is dire need to change the Arbitration system and emphasized that there should be a fixed time frame for any Arbitration. They also vouched for the cost effectiveness of the entire process. The members stressed action against the government counsels for their casual approach during the litigation process and said that a provision for submitting the status report of court cases by the Nodal officers to the head of departments on regular basis. The Member also persisted for the availability of WiFi facility in various High Courts and subordinate Courts. The Minister while agreeing with the members said that there concerns will be taken care of.
A Presentation were also made during the meeting to highlight the need to have a litigation Policy in which it was shown that due to the very high number of pending court cases in different courts this has become utmost necessary. More over the need to reduce Government Litigation in courts so that valuable court time would be spent in resolving other pending cases. In its 126th Report on “Government and Public Sector Undertaking Litigation Policy and Strategies”, the Law Commission has also expressed the need of having a Litigation Policy to avoid litigation or reduce it at any cost which will bring down the load on the court system resulting in reduction of expenses on judicial set up.
During the meeting Minutes and ATR (Action Taken Report) of the last meeting of the Consultative Committee meeting held on 15th December, 2014 were also ratified which comprised the agenda items regarding e-Courts/ Computerizations of Courts and Repeal of obsolete and redundant Laws.
Earlier the Ministers welcomed the Members and gave details of the passing of two bills in the Parliament out of the four tabled bills.
The Minister said that the policy suggest mechanism to reduce filing of cases by or against the Government. It also aims to transform Government as an Institution which does not believe in entering into unnecessary and avoidable litigation in the courts by taking appropriate steps at pre-litigation stage itself.
During the meeting members of the Committee Shri Kalyan Bannerjee and Shri Ayannur Manjunath , said there is dire need to change the Arbitration system and emphasized that there should be a fixed time frame for any Arbitration. They also vouched for the cost effectiveness of the entire process. The members stressed action against the government counsels for their casual approach during the litigation process and said that a provision for submitting the status report of court cases by the Nodal officers to the head of departments on regular basis. The Member also persisted for the availability of WiFi facility in various High Courts and subordinate Courts. The Minister while agreeing with the members said that there concerns will be taken care of.
A Presentation were also made during the meeting to highlight the need to have a litigation Policy in which it was shown that due to the very high number of pending court cases in different courts this has become utmost necessary. More over the need to reduce Government Litigation in courts so that valuable court time would be spent in resolving other pending cases. In its 126th Report on “Government and Public Sector Undertaking Litigation Policy and Strategies”, the Law Commission has also expressed the need of having a Litigation Policy to avoid litigation or reduce it at any cost which will bring down the load on the court system resulting in reduction of expenses on judicial set up.
During the meeting Minutes and ATR (Action Taken Report) of the last meeting of the Consultative Committee meeting held on 15th December, 2014 were also ratified which comprised the agenda items regarding e-Courts/ Computerizations of Courts and Repeal of obsolete and redundant Laws.
Earlier the Ministers welcomed the Members and gave details of the passing of two bills in the Parliament out of the four tabled bills.
**********
(Release ID :121879)
Source: Press Information Bureau (PIB)
Law Commission of India Submits Report on Guardianship and Custody Laws: Proposes Amendments to Focus on “Welfare of the Child” in Custody Matters
The
Law Commission of India has submitted its Report No. 257 on “Reforms in
Guardianship and Custody Laws in India” today to the Union Minister of Law
and Justice. The report suggests amendments to existing laws to emphasize
the “welfare of the child” in custody and guardianship matters, and introduces
the concept of joint custody as an option to be considered in certain cases.
Children
are the worst affected in proceedings of divorce and family breakdowns. Often,
parents use children as pawns to strike their own bargains, without considering
the emotional, social and mental upheavals that the children may face. The
Commission believes this imbalanced situation can be addressed in some measure
through changes to the law that will place a duty upon the court to uphold the
child’s welfare in each and every case. This will ensure that the child’s
future is safe and protected, regardless of changing familial circumstances.
Courts
in India have recognised the welfare principle, but many aspects of the legal
and judicial framework remain wanting. Courts tend to grant custody of a child
to either one parent or another, presuming that it is for the welfare of the
child. Joint custody arrangements, where both parents have custody of the
child, are rarely considered.
Problems
in court decisions are compounded by inconsistencies in the law. For instance,
the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, regards the welfare of the child
as being of paramount consideration, but the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890,
contains no such provision. Similarly, the 1956 law does not treat the mother
on an equal footing with the father as the natural guardian of her child.
Further, custody battles are among the most fiercely fought in courts, because
there is no agreement or understanding about what constitutes the welfare of
the child. As a result, it is impossible to ensure that the interests of the
child are actually protected. The legal framework also contains no guidelines
about the manner and process by which custody issues should be handled.
Accordingly,
this report of the Law Commission reviews the current laws dealing with custody
and guardianship, and recommends legislative amendments to the Guardians and
Wards Act, 1890 and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.
These amendments are necessary in order to bring these laws in tune with modern
social considerations. Major amendments are recommended to the Guardians and
Wards Act, 1890, by introducing a new chapter on custody and visitation
arrangements. The Commission believes that the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890,
being a secular law, will be relevant for all custody proceedings, besides any
personal laws that may apply.
The
new chapter opens with a set of objectives, to clarify that the welfare of the
child is the primary guiding factor in all such matters. For the first time in
India, the amendments also introduce several concepts relating to joint custody
and child welfare, such as child support, mediation processes, parenting plans,
and grand parenting time.
The key
aspects of the legislative recommendations are as follows:
1.
Welfare
principle:
The draft law strengthens the welfare principle in the Guardians and Wards Act,
1890, with a continuous emphasis on its relevance in each aspect of
guardianship and custody related decision-making
2.
Abolition
of preference: The draft law removes the preference for the father as the
natural guardian under Hindu law, and both parents are granted equal legal
status with respect to guardianship and custody.
3.
Joint
custody: The
draft law empowers courts to award joint custody to both parents in
circumstances conducive to the welfare of the child, or award sole custody to
one parent with visitation rights to the other.
4.
Mediation: Parties to a
custody matter must ordinarily consider expert-led and time-bound mediation,
which can not only promote better outcomes for parents and children, but also
reduce the strain on the overburdened court system.
5.
Child
support:
The draft law empowers courts to fix an amount specifically for child support,
to meet basic living expenses of the child. Financial resources of parents, and
the standard of living of the child must be considered when fixing such
amounts. Child support must continue till the child turns 18, but may be
extended till 25; or longer, in case of a child with mental or physical
disability.
6.
Guidelines: The draft
law includes detailed guidelines to help courts, parents and other stakeholders
arrive at the best arrangement to serve the welfare of the child. The
guidelines introduce several new concepts in this regard, including parenting
plans, grand parenting time, visitation rights, and relocation of parents. They
also elaborate the position on related aspects such as determining the
intelligent preference of a child, access to records of the child, and
mediation.
***********
(Release ID :121932)
Source: Press Information Bureau (PIB)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)